Dream on Asshole

| 1 Comment

Davey Brooks found his way into his wife's secret stash of opiates again.

David Brooks: Party No. 3
A McCain-Lieberman Party is emerging because of deep trends that are polarizing our politics.

There are two major parties on the ballot, but there are three major parties in America. There is the Democratic Party, the Republican Party and the McCain-Lieberman Party.

All were on display Tuesday night.

The Democratic Party was represented by its rising force — Ned Lamont on a victory platform with the net roots exulting before him and Al Sharpton smiling just behind. The Republican Party was represented by its collapsing old guard — scandal-tainted Tom DeLay trying to get his name removed from the November ballot. And the McCain-Lieberman Party was represented by Joe Lieberman himself, giving a concession speech that explained why polarized primary voters shouldn’t be allowed to define the choices in American politics.

If there is going to be a third party, why would it combine the worst pandering parts of both of the existing parties? If the McCain-Lieberman Party ever wins an election, I'm on record right now as saying that I shall dip my eyeballs into the juices of 37 habanero peppers (which, as I just discovered, even the hours-old juice of one stem is enough to sting one's eye for quite some time. Dumb-ass, you'd think after all the years spent living in Texas and eating spicy food, I'd know to avoid rubbing my eye after chopping habaneros. I digress.).

Back to Hop Head Brooks:

Umm, is he trying to say that that photo of Whiny Joe Lieberman and Al Sharpton floating around is a media creation of Adnan Hajj?

Looks like Lieberman is pretty upset to be next to Mr. Sharpton, doesn't it.

Whiny Joe Lieberman and Al Sharpton

Who are you going to believe, your lying eyes, or Hop Head Brooks?

Anyway, my eyeball is throbbing, so you can read the rest yourself. Believe me, there's plenty to ridicule. I just don't have the stamina at the moment. Ok, I couldn't help myself. Sorry.

Tags: , /

The flamers in the established parties tell themselves that their enemies are so vicious they have to be vicious too. They rationalize their behavior by insisting that circumstances have forced them to shelve their integrity for the good of the country. They imagine that once they have achieved victory through pulverizing rhetoric they will return to the moderate and nuanced sensibilities they think they still possess.

[Since when are the right wingers called 'flamers'. Santorum may not like that appellation.]

But the experience of DeLay and the net-root DeLays in the Democratic Party amply demonstrates that means determine ends. Hyper-partisans may have started with subtle beliefs, but their beliefs led them to partisanship and their partisanship led to malice and malice made them extremist, and pretty soon they were no longer the same people.

[interesting theory. DeLay and Markos of Daily Kos are now equals. Hmmm.]

The McCain-Lieberman Party counters with constant reminders that country comes before party, that in politics a little passion energizes but unmarshaled passion corrupts, and that more people want to vote for civility than for venom.

[right, so Whiny Joe knows what is good for the country, more so than any of those idiot voters in his state. Let us overthrow the Constitution now, right? Sore Loserman has no ego involved at all, he just is so, so certain his ideas are better for all of us, that we are going to be eternally in his debt, once he manages to Diebold his way back into the Senate.]

On policy grounds, too, the McCain-Lieberman Party is distinct. On foreign policy, it agrees with Tony Blair (who could not win a Democratic primary in the U.S. today): The civilized world faces an arc of Islamic extremism that was not caused by American overreaction, and that will only get stronger if America withdraws.

[Tony Blair is a Democrat? Interesting, I guess that anti-foreigner sentiment has been reduced since last we checked]

On fiscal policy, the McCain-Lieberman Party sees a Republican Party that will not raise taxes and a Democratic Party that will not cut benefits, and understands that to avoid bankruptcy the country must do both.

[oh, really? Any evidence of this alleged sentiment on the part of either McCain or Lieberman? Oh, right. This is another entry in the David Brooks re-writes Kublai Khan For Modern Times file]

On globalization, the McCain-Lieberman Party believes that free trade reduces poverty but that government must invest in human capital so people can compete. It believes in comprehensive immigration reform.

The McCain-Lieberman Party sees Democrats in the grip of teachers’ unions and Republicans who let corporations write environmental rules. It sees two parties that depend on the culture war for internal cohesion and that make abortion a litmus test.

It sees two traditions immobilized to trench warfare.

The McCain-Lieberman Party is emerging because the war with Islamic extremism, which opened new fissures and exacerbated old ones, will dominate the next five years as much as it has dominated the last five. It is emerging because of deep trends that are polarizing our politics. It is emerging because social conservatives continue to pull the GOP rightward (look at how Representative Joe Schwarz, a moderate Republican, was defeated by a conservative rival in Michigan). It is emerging because highly educated secular liberals are pulling the Democrats upscale and to the left. (Lamont’s voters are rich, and 65 percent call themselves liberals, compared with 30 percent of Democrats nationwide.)

The history of third parties is that they get absorbed into one of the existing two, and that will probably happen here. John McCain and Hillary Clinton will try to reconcile their centrist approaches with the hostile forces in their own parties. And maybe they will succeed (McCain has a better chance, since the ideologues on the right feel vulnerable while the ideologues on the left, perpetually two years behind the national mood, think the public wants more rage).

But amid the hurly-burly of the next few years — the continuing jihad, Speaker Pelosi, a possible economic slowdown — the old parties could become even more inflamed. Both could reject McCain-Liebermanism.

At that point things really get interesting.

umm, no comment.

1 Comment

Sorry, I meant to delete all of my snark, but it slipped through my tears of rage.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Seth A. published on August 10, 2006 4:27 PM.

Deceit Beyond Bounds was the previous entry in this blog.

Crowd control is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.37