<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Paid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/</link>
	<description>Spreading confusion over the internet since 1994</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Infrared Bridge for Sale at B12 Solipsism</title>
		<link>http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Infrared Bridge for Sale at B12 Solipsism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>[...] for Sale", url: "http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/08/12/infrared-bridge-for-sale/" });Footnotes:  Harlan Elison&#8217;s words were ringing in my ears: get paid! Don&#8217;t give away your work for free! [&#8617;] I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Sale&#8221;, url: &#8220;http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/08/12/infrared-bridge-for-sale/&#8221; });Footnotes:  Harlan Elison&#8217;s words were ringing in my ears: get paid! Don&#8217;t give away your work for free! [&#8617;] I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>GapersBlock not so much (more text per page), but the Chicagoist wouldn't be able to post a single entry without using somebody's Flickr photo. If they had to pay, I doubt they'd post as much, or even be able to post at all. 

Actually, I stopped giving Chicagoist use of my photos recently. I wasn't seeing any benefit to it.  Though I still use CC licensing, so presumedly, quasi commercial sites could still 'em. 

It's sort of like third world labor: the pool of available workers (or photographers) is so vast, wages are low, and not going higher anytime soon.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GapersBlock not so much (more text per page), but the Chicagoist wouldn&#8217;t be able to post a single entry without using somebody&#8217;s Flickr photo. If they had to pay, I doubt they&#8217;d post as much, or even be able to post at all. </p>
<p>Actually, I stopped giving Chicagoist use of my photos recently. I wasn&#8217;t seeing any benefit to it.  Though I still use CC licensing, so presumedly, quasi commercial sites could still &#8216;em. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of like third world labor: the pool of available workers (or photographers) is so vast, wages are low, and not going higher anytime soon.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.b12partners.net/wp/2008/07/25/get-paid/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Hi Seth--
 I've wondered what the effect of flickr and cc licensing has done to photo rates if any at all--I mean, chicagoist and gapersblock are using solicited flickr pools for much of their images, but would they even be able to pay if they didn't have free to use images?  I mean, treehugger for instance is now owned by Discovery.  Does that suddenly mean they start paying for stuff they've used from flickr?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Seth&#8211;<br />
 I&#8217;ve wondered what the effect of flickr and cc licensing has done to photo rates if any at all&#8211;I mean, chicagoist and gapersblock are using solicited flickr pools for much of their images, but would they even be able to pay if they didn&#8217;t have free to use images?  I mean, treehugger for instance is now owned by Discovery.  Does that suddenly mean they start paying for stuff they&#8217;ve used from flickr?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
