B12 Solipsism

Spreading confusion over the internet since 1994

Shut Fisk and Crawford Coal Plants

with 2 comments

Shuttering the damn things would be my preference – I can see the Fisk Coal plant from my window, spewing all sorts of toxins, and I don’t even live that close by.

Tales of the Towering Dead

Owners of two coal-fueled power plants on Chicago’s Southwest Side would have to clean them up within the next five years — or shut them down — under a proposal being pushed by an interesting coalition of aldermen and a Chicago environmental group.

   The proposed ordinance is aimed at the circa-1920s Fisk plant in Pilsen and the Crawford plant in Little Village, both now operated by Midwest Generation LLC.

Under its terms, scrubbers and related anti-pollution equipment would have to be installed by 2013-15, four to five years earlier than now required by state regulators.

   “The purpose is to get two of the oldest, dirtiest coal plants located in any urban neighborhood cleaned up soon,” said Howard Learner, executive director of Chicago’s Environmental Law and Policy Center.

    “These are the two biggest (single) point sources of pollution in the city,” Mr. Learner added. But modernization of the plants repeatedly has been deferred, and the city now has an interest in making the plants “clean up or shut down,” he said.

   A statement e-mailed by Alderman Joseph Moore (49th) said the measure will be co-sponsored by him and colleagues including Sandi Jackson (7th), Eugene Schulter (47th) and Toni Preckwinkle (4th).

   Ms. Preckwinkle’s presence is particularly notable since she is the Democratic nominee to head the Cook County Board and is heavily favored to win that position in the November general election.

[Click to continue reading Push begins to ‘clean up or shut’ Fisk, Crawford coal power plants | Greg Hinz | Crain’s Chicago Business]

Cleaning them up so they fit current EPA standards would be a positive step, but would mean that lots of toxins would still be allowed, just not quite as much.

Written by Seth Anderson

April 8th, 2010 at 3:22 pm

2 Responses to 'Shut Fisk and Crawford Coal Plants'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Shut Fisk and Crawford Coal Plants'.

  1. actually that is water vapor coming out of the stack. These plants actually produce very little pollution. The real culprit is trucks and autos. Coal fired power plant disperse wahtever small amounts of pollutants into the upper atmosphere.

    Closing these plant would only shift the electric power production burden to natural gas which does burn cleaner. However natural gas is much more expensive. It will continue to put pressure on the poor through increased power rates.

    Also the city will lose a great deal of revenue if these plants close in taxes and lost revenue for the community.

    The long term answer is nuclear power and clean coal. Renewables like the wind turbines are another scam. The cost more to install then a nuclear power plant and ran at capacities of 20-25%. Plus they are an eyesore on the country side. You would need about 900 of them to replace Fisk & Crawford except they couldn’t generate reliable power.

    Please look deeply into the problem. It is because of people like you that China produces everything we lose and each day the AMerican economy grows weaker. Valle is the biggest joke of all.
    IMHO

    Mike

    18 Jan 11 at 6:27 am

  2. […] wouldn’t want to live near this plant, despite what apologists like to claim. Being able to see the plume is bad […]

Leave a Reply