Why Romney’s Vileness Matters

You Might Be Right
You Might Be Right

Paul Krugman makes a good point that bears repeating, namely that GWB was treated with deference by the corporate media in 2000, and it was one of the factors that cost Al Gore the election. Luckily, Willard is a lot less likable than the Shrub…

I’ve seen some comparisons between Mitt Romney’s position right now and that of George W. Bush after the Democratic convention in 2000, and by the numbers there is some resemblance. But what really happened in the final months of that election? The answer — not a popular one with journalists, but very obviously true to anyone who lived through it — was that the press took sides. Reporters liked Bush and didn’t like Gore, and as a result they treated Bush with kid gloves while gleefully passing on every smear against his opponent (“Gore says he invented the internet!” No, he never did).

That probably wasn’t going to happen this time in any case. But now Romney has really ensured that everyone in the news media, the GOP propaganda organs aside, is going to view him with distaste and alarm — as well they should.

Romney could still win, but he has just made it even harder for anyone to consider him suitable for the job.

(click here to continue reading Why The Vileness Matters – NYTimes.com.)

John Aravosis of AmericaBlog collected a brief sampling of some of the newspaper editorial board responses:

Editorial boards savage Romney over Egypt/Libya

(click here to continue reading US Politics | AMERICAblog News: Editorial boards savage Romney over Egypt/Libya.)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.