B12 Solipsism

Spreading confusion over the internet since 1994

The Facebook Fallacy

with 2 comments

Coins of Realms
Coins of Realms

Very interesting point – is Facebook really a viable business? Will it be around in ten years? Will it be profitable? How?

Facebook is not only on course to go bust, but will take the rest of the ad-supported Web with it.

Given its vast cash reserves and the glacial pace of business reckonings, that will sound hyperbolic. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t true.

At the heart of the Internet business is one of the great business fallacies of our time: that the Web, with all its targeting abilities, can be a more efficient, and hence more profitable, advertising medium than traditional media. Facebook, with its 900 million users, valuation of around $100 billion, and the bulk of its business in traditional display advertising, is now at the heart of the heart of the fallacy.

The daily and stubborn reality for everybody building businesses on the strength of Web advertising is that the value of digital ads decreases every quarter, a consequence of their simultaneous ineffectiveness and efficiency. The nature of people’s behavior on the Web and of how they interact with advertising, as well as the character of those ads themselves and their inability to command real attention, has meant a marked decline in advertising’s impact.

I don’t know anyone in the ad-Web business who isn’t engaged in a relentless, demoralizing, no-exit operation to realign costs with falling per-user revenues, or who isn’t manically inflating traffic to compensate for ever-lower per-user value.

Facebook, however, has convinced large numbers of otherwise intelligent people that the magic of the medium will reinvent advertising in a heretofore unimaginably profitable way, or that the company will create something new that isn’t advertising, which will produce even more wonderful profits. But at a forward profit-to-earnings ratio of 56 (as of the close of trading on May 21), these innovations will have to be something like alchemy to make the company worth its sticker price. For comparison, Google trades at a forward P/E ratio of 12.

(click here to continue reading The Facebook Fallacy – Technology Review.)

Live to Ride
Live to Ride

Facebook may have demographic information on 800,000,000 people, more or less, with more of less accuracy1, but what are they going to be able to do with this data? Currently, Facebook ads are so poorly targeted as to be a joke. I just looked at my profile, and see seven ads, only one of which is even mildly targeted to me2. The others are Dell ads3, luxury clothing ads, credit card ads, and some GMO tea in a plastic bottle. No wonder that GM decided to spend their money elsewhere. They weren’t the first to notice abysmal performance with Facebook ads. I’d be hard pressed to advise an advertiser to spend money on Facebook when there are so many better options.

General Motors Co said on Tuesday it will stop advertising on Facebook, even as the social networking website prepares to go public.

While GM gave no specific reason for dropping Facebook ads, a source familiar with the automaker’s plans said the company’s marketing executives decided Facebook’s ads had little impact on consumers.

(click here to continue reading GM to drop Facebook ads due to low consumer impact | Reuters.)

If I was a broker, I wouldn’t own Facebook stock for long.

Footnotes:
  1. for instance, I have lots of erroneous information in my profile, just on principle []
  2. some sort of hot sauce []
  3. plural!! even though one of the only things in my FB profile is a love of Macs! []

Written by Seth Anderson

May 22nd, 2012 at 2:55 pm

Posted in Advertising,Business

Tagged with ,

2 Responses to 'The Facebook Fallacy'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'The Facebook Fallacy'.

  1. I straight up think the Facebook thing is – can I say deplorable? Is that too lofty a word? I don’t mean to say I understand ‘the market’ or that I understand what ‘FB’ is accomplishing within the market. Rather, I mean to suggest that the very moment I saw the first online advertisement (a news article ramping things up with a pic of the founder guy, and hype, hype, hype), …dude, I just shook my head.

    I don’t know what it means when Facebook is some type of worthy commodity that’s somehow generating revenue at some stock exchange. I just know it sounds disastrous. And didn’t we just go through that shady banking crap not too long ago? I mean, did the IQ’s just drop sharply in recent months? …Oh no, I say to myself shaking my head. Here it comes again. …..Come one, Facebook. Prove me wrong. Show me you can create a couple of new billionaires and NOT crash the global market so that the rest of us end up being the source of these new dudes’ wealth.

    In fact, you know what? Here, let me turn my pockets inside out for you right now. Take everything I have. Save the world a lot of misery. …..Now, does this mean I have a bad attitude? Or just a bad taste in my mouth from the last time I was force fed a load of …you get the point, right? …is it too late for me to start writing letters of objection? …or maybe vote on this thing in a democratic way? Nevermind, I’m sure I must be wrong in my thinking somehow – and that these ‘smartest guys in the room’ know something I don’t.

    John Cutting

    22 May 12 at 5:40 pm

  2. […] speaking of Facebook’s deplorable business model, there turns out to be some Wall Street shenanigans going on as the IPO began. Lest you forget, Wall […]

Leave a Reply